Head Start Impact Study. Final Report. January 2010. Prepared for: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. Administration for Children and Families. Performance Standards to ensure that programs provide a wide array of comprehensive services for families. One of 10 tasks in the Attention and Memory battery.

Keywords,,,,,,, Administration for Children and Families. Head Start fact sheets. Retrieved from Administration for Children, Youth and Families. Head Start program performance standards and other regulations.

Federal Register, 61, Number 215. Arnold, D.H., McWilliams, L., & Arnold, E.H. Teacher discipline and child misbehavior in day care: Untangling causality with correlational data. Developmental Psychology, 34, 276- 287.,, Bailey, R. Conscious discipline. Available from Brimhall, D. National household education survey.

Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.

Capizzano, J., & Adams, G. New federalism: National survey of American families. Retrieved from Center on the Social Emotional Foundations for Early Learning. Training modules.

Retrieved from Children’s Defense Fund. Child care basics. Retrieved from Committee for Children. Second Step violence prevention program. Seattle, WA: Author. Connors, K.C. The Connors Continuous Performance Test.

North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems. Dodge, D.T., Colker, L.J., & Heroman, C.

The Creative Curriculum[R] for Preschool ( 4th ed.). Oshin Theme Mp3 Download. Washington, DC: Teaching Strategies.

Donegan, M.M., Ostrosky, M.M., & Fowler, S.A. Children enrolled in multiple programs: Characteristics, supports, and barriers to teacher communication. Journal of Early Intervention, 20, 95- 106., Doubet, S., Ostrosky, M.M., & Hemmeter, M.L. ( 2009, October). Child care teachers’ experiences as they support young children with challenging behavior. Poster presentation at DEC International Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico. Dunlap, G., & Fox, L.

A demonstration of behavioral support for young children with autism. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1, 77- 87., Fox, L., & Hemmeter, M.L. ( 2005, March). Program-wide approaches to implementing positive behavior supports in early childhood settings. Paper presented at the Association for Positive Behavior Supports Conference, Tampa, Florida. Fox, L., & Little, N. Starting early: School-wide behavior support in a community preschool.

Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 3, 251- 254., Frateenburg, W.K., & Bresnick, B. DENVER II Pre-screening Questionnaire (PDQ II). Denver, CO: Denver Developmental Materials. Gilliam, W.S. Prekindergarteners left behind: Expulsion rates in state prekindergarten systems.

Yale University Child Study Center. Retrieved from Harms, T., Clifford, R.M., & Cryer, D. Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale-Revised. Carroboro, NC: Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute. Head Start Bureau. Income guidelines for participation in Head Start programs.

Retrieved from Hemmeter, M.L., & Fox, L. The Teaching Pyramid: A model for the implementation of classroom practices within a program-wide approach to behavior support.

NHSA Dialogue, 12, 133- 147., Hemmeter, M.L., Fox, L., & Doubet, S. Together we can: An early childhood center’s program wide approach to addressing challenging behavior. Young Exceptional Children Monograph Series, 8, 1- 14. Hemmeter, M.L., Fox, L., Jack, S., & Broyles, L. A program wide model of positive behavior support in early childhood settings.

Journal of Early Intervention, 29, 337- 355., Hemmeter, M.L., Fox, L., & Snyder, P. The Teaching Pyramid Observation Tool, research edition. Unpublished assessment. Johnson, L.J., & LaMontagne, M.J. Using content analysis to examine the verbal or written communication of stakeholders within early intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 17, 73- 79., Joseph, G., Strain, P., & Skinner, B. Survey of children’s challenging behavior in early care and education settings (Unpublished manuscript).

University of Colorado at Denver. Kaufmann, R., & Wischmann, A.L. Communities supporting the mental health of young children and their families.

Magrab (Eds.), Where children live: Solutions for serving young children and their families (pp. Stamford, CT: Ablex. Conduct disorders in childhood and adolescence.

Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., Lewis, T.J., & Sugai, G. Effective behavior support: A systems approach to proactive schoolwide management.

Decision Trees For Differential Diagnosis Pdf Free. Focus on Exceptional Children, 31, 1- 24. Mincic, M., Smith, B.J., & Strain, P. Administrator strategies that support high fidelity implementation of the pyramid model for promoting social-emotional competence and addressing challenging behaviors. Policy brief for the Technical Assistance Center on Social Emotional Intervention for Young Children. Retrieved from President’s New Freedom Commission of Mental Health. Achieving the promise: Transforming mental health care in America. Final report of President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health (SAMHSA Publication 03-3832).

Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Qi, C.H., & Kaiser, A.P. Behavior problems of preschool children from low-income families: Review of the literature.

Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 23, 188- 216., Quesenberry, A., Hemmeter, M.L., & Ostrosky, M.M. ( 2005, June).

Rubric for reviewing Head Start policies and procedures related to child guidance and behavior. Paper presented at the Bi-Annual Head Start Research Conference, Washington, DC. Raver, C.C., & Knitzer, J.

Ready to enter: What research tells policymakers about strategies to promote social and emotional school readiness among three- and four-year-old children (Promoting the Emotional Well-being of Children and Families, Policy paper #3). National Center for Children in Poverty, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University. Sandall, S.R., & Schwartz, I.S. Building blocks for teaching preschoolers with special needs.

Baltimore, MD: Brookes. I can problem solve (preschool). Champaign, IL: Research Press. Squires, J., Bricker, D.D., & Twombly, E. Ages and stages questionnaire: Social emotional. Baltimore, MD: Brookes. Strain, P.S., & Timm, M.A.

Remediation and prevention of aggression: An evaluation of the regional intervention program over a quarter century. Behavioral Disorders, 26, 297- 313. Sugai, G., Sprague, J.R., Horner, R.H., & Walker, H.M. The use of office discipline referrals to assess and monitor school-wide discipline interventions.

Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 94- 101., Walker, H.M., Stiller, B., & Golly, A. First step to success: A collaborative home-school intervention for preventing antisocial behavior at the point of school entry. Ostrosky (Eds.), Young exceptional children monograph series: No. Practical ideas for addressing challenging behaviors (pp. Longmont, CO: Sopris West. Webster-Stratton, C. Early intervention for families of preschool children with conduct problems.

Guralnick (Ed.), The effectiveness of early interventions (pp. Baltimore, MD: Brookes. Webster-Stratton, C., & Hammond, M. Conduct problems and levels of social competence in Head Start children: Prevalence, pervasiveness, and associated risk factors.

Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 1, 101- 124.,, Webster-Stratton, C., Reid, M.J., & Hammond, M. Preventing conduct problems, promoting social competence: A parent and teacher training partnership in Head Start. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 30, 283- 302. West, J., Denton, K., & Germino-Hausken, E.

America’s kindergartener: Findings from the early childhood longitudinal study, kindergarten class of 1998-99, fall 2008. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics.

Zigler, E., & Muenchow, S. Head Start: The inside story of America’s most successful educational experiment. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Improving children's attendance is a high priority for Head Start and other early childhood education programs serving low-income children. We conducted a randomized control trial in a major northern city to evaluate the impact of a low-cost intervention designed to promote parents' social capital as a potential influence on children's attendance in Head Start centers. The intervention assigned children to treatment group classrooms based on (a) neighborhood of residence (geography condition) or (b) the geography condition plus the opportunity for parents to form partnerships in support of their children's attendance, or to control group classrooms according to Head Start guidelines only. We did not find impacts on average attendance throughout the year. However, the intervention did lead to increased attendance during the winter when average center attendance was lowest. There were no impacts on fall or spring attendance. Follow-up exploratory analyses of focus groups with parents and staff suggested that parents' level of connection and trust, self-generated partnership strategies, and commitment to their children's education may be factors by which parents' social capital expands and children's attendance improves.