Full text of ' UNLEASHED AND UNACCOUNTABLE The FBI's Unchecked Abuse of Authority September 2013 ACLU AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION Table of Contents Executive Summary i Introduction 1 I. Tension Between Domestic Intelligence and Constitutional Rights 2 II. Unleashed: The New Post-9/1 1 Powers 4 A. Surveillance Powers, Given and Taken 4 1. USA Patriot Act 4 2. Exigent Letters and a Secret OLC Opinion 7 3.

Warrantless Wiretapping and the FISA Amendments Act 8 B. Expanding FBI Investigative Authorities 9 1. Ashcroft Attorney General's Guidelines 9 2. Evidence of FBI Spying on Political Activists 10 3. 2010 Inspector General Report Confirms Spying and Lying 11 4. Mukasey Attorney General's Guidelines 12 C.

One Cello x 16 (EP) by Zoe Keating, released 01 November 2004 1. Walking Man 3. Coda Composed, performed, recorded and produced by Zoe. Download Rhinestone Template Software Read more. Star Wars Battlefront 3 Free Radical Download Read more. Scorpion Island Games Cbbc Games Read more. Zoe Keating Exigency Download Read more. Windows Serial Console Program Windows.

FBI Profiling Based on Race, Ethnicity, Religion, and National Origin 13 1. The FBI Domestic Operations and Investigations Guide 14 2. Racial and Ethnic Mapping 15 3. Innocent Victims of Aggressive Investigation and Surveillance 18 D.

Unrestrained Data Collection and Data Mining 19 1. EGuardian and 'Suspicious' Activity Reports 19 2. Mining Big Data: FTTTF, IDW, and NSAC 20 3.

Real Threats Still Slipping Through the Cracks 23 4. Mining Bigger Data: the NCTC Guidelines 27 5. Exploitation of New Technologies 28 6.

Secret Spying and Secret Law 28 III. Unaccountable: Evidence of Abuse, Need for Reform 29 A. Shirking Justice Department Oversight 29 B. Suppressing Whistleblowers 30 C. Circumventing External Controls 32 1. Targeting Journalists 32 2.

Thwarting Congressional Oversight 33 3. Thwarting Public Oversight with Excessive Secrecy 34 IV. Targeting First Amendment Activity 36 A. Biased Training 36 B. Targeting AMEMSA Communities 39 C. Targeting Activists 41 V.

Greater Oversight Needed: The FBI Abroad 43 A. Proxy Detentions 43 B. FBI Overseas Interrogation Policy 45 C. Use of No-fly List to Pressure Americans Abroad to Become Informants 46 VI.

Conclusion and Recommendations 48 Executive Summary The Federal Bureau of Investigation serves a crucial role in securing the United States from criminals, terrorists, and hostile foreign agents. Just as importantly, the FBI also protects civil rights and civil liberties, ensures honest government, and defends the rule of law. Its agents serve around the country and around the world with a high degree of professionalism and competence, often under difficult and dangerous conditions. Autosketch Skd Converter Boxes. But throughout its history, the FBI has also regularly overstepped the law, infringing on Americans' constitutional rights while overzealously pursuing its domestic security mission. After the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, Congress and successive attorneys general loosened many of the legal and internal controls that a previous generation had placed on the FBI to protect Americans' constitutional rights.

As a result, the FBI is repeating mistakes of the past and is again unfairly targeting immigrants, racial and religious minorities, and political dissidents for surveillance, infiltration, investigation, and 'disruption strategies.' But modern technological innovations have significantly increased the threat to American liberty by giving today's FBI the capability to collect, store, and analyze data about millions of innocent Americans. The excessive secrecy with which it cloaks these domestic intelligence gathering operations has crippled constitutional oversight mechanisms. Courts have been reticent to challenge government secrecy demands and, despite years of debate in Congress regarding the proper scope of domestic surveillance, it took unauthorized leaks by a whistleblower to finally reveal the government's secret interpretations of these laws and the Orwellian scope of its domestic surveillance programs.

There is evidence the FBI's increased intelligence collection powers have harmed, rather than aided, its terrorism prevention efforts by overwhelming agents with a flood of irrelevant data and false alarms. Former FBI Director William Webster evaluated the FBI's investigation of Maj. Nadal Hasan prior to the Ft. Hood shooting and cited the 'relentless' workload resulting from a 'data explosion' within the FBI as an impediment to proper intelligence analysis. And members of Congress questioned several other incidents in which the FBI investigated but failed to interdict individuals who later committed murderous terrorist attacks, including the Boston Marathon bombing. While preventing every possible act of terrorism is an impossible goal, an examination of these cases raise serious questions regarding the efficacy of FBI methods.

FBI data showing that more than half of the violent crimes, including over a third of the murders in the U.S., go unsolved each year calls for a broader analysis of the proper distribution of law enforcement resources. With the appointment of Director James Comey, the FBI has seen its first change in leadership since the 9/11 attacks, which provides an opportunity for Congress, the president, and the attorney general to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the FBI's policies and programs. This report highlights areas in which the FBI has abused its authority and recommends reforms to i ensure the FBI fulfills its law enforcement and security missions with proper public oversight and respect for constitutional rights and democratic ideals.

The report describes major changes to law and policy that unleashed the FBI from its traditional restraints and opened the door to abuse. Congress enhanced many of the FBI's surveillance powers after 9/11, primarily through the USA Patriot Act and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Amendments.

The recent revelations regarding the FBI's use of Section 215 of the USA Patriot Act to track all U.S. Telephone calls is only the latest in a long line of abuse. Five Justice Department Inspector General audits documented widespread FBI misuse of Patriot Act authorities in 2007 and 2008. Congress and the American public deserve to know the full scope of the FBI's spying on Americans under the Patriot Act and all other surveillance authorities. Attorney General Michael Mukasey rewrote the FBI's rule book in 2008, giving FBI agents unfettered authority to investigate anyone they choose without any factual basis for suspecting wrongdoing. The 2008 Attorney General's Guidelines created a new kind of intrusive investigation called an 'assessment,' which requires no 'factual predicate' and can include searches through government or commercial databases, overt or covert FBI interviews, and tasking informants to gather information about anyone or to infiltrate lawful organizations. In a two-year period from 2009 to 201 1, the FBI opened over 82,000 'assessments' of individuals or organizations, less than 3,500 of which discovered information justifying further investigation.

The 2008 guidelines also authorized the FBI's racial and ethnic mapping program, which allows the FBI to collect demographic information to map American communities by race and ethnicity for intelligence purposes, based on crass racial stereotypes about the crimes each group commits. FBI documents obtained by the American Civil Liberties Union show the FBI mapped Chinese and Russian communities in San Francisco for organized crime purposes, all Latino communities in New Jersey and Alabama because there are street gangs, African Americans in Georgia to find 'Black separatists,' and Middle-Eastern communities in Detroit for terrorism. The FBI also claimed the authority to sweep up voluminous amounts of information secretly from state and local law enforcement and private data aggregators for data mining purposes. In 2007, the FBI said it amassed databases containing 1.5 billion records, which were predicted to grow to 6 billion records by 2012, which is equal to 20 separate 'records' for every person in the United States. The largest of these databases, the Foreign Terrorist Tracking Task Force, currently has 360 staff members running 40 separate projects. A 2013 Inspector General audit determined it 'did not always provide FBI field offices with timely and relevant information.'

The next section of the report discusses the ways the FBI avoids accountability by skirting internal and external oversight. The FBI, which Congress exempted from the Whistleblower Protection Act, effectively suppresses internal dissent by retaliating against employees who report waste, fraud, abuse, and illegality. As a result, 28 percent of non-supervisory FBI ii employees surveyed by the Inspector General said they 'never' reported misconduct they saw or heard about on the job. The FBI also aggressively investigates other government whistleblowers, which has led to an unprecedented increase in Espionage Act prosecutions over the last five years. And the FBI's overzealous pursuit of government whistleblowers has also resulted in the inappropriate targeting of journalists for investigation, infringing on free press rights. Recent coverage of overbroad subpoenas for telephone records of Associated Press journalists and an inappropriate search warrant for a Fox News reporter are only the latest examples of abuse. In 2010 the Inspector General reported the FBI used an illegal 'exigent letter' to obtain the telephone records of 7 New York Times and Washington Post reporters.

And the FBI thwarts congressional oversight with excessive secrecy and delayed or misleading responses to questions from Congress. Finally, the report highlights evidence of abuse that requires greater regulation, oversight, and public accountability.

These include many examples of the FBI targeting First Amendment activities by spying on protesters and religious groups with aggressive tactics that infringe on their free speech, religion, and associational rights. In 201 1, the ACLU exposed flawed and biased FBI training materials that likely fueled these inappropriate investigations.

The FBI also operates increasingly outside the United States, where its activities are more difficult to monitor. Several troubling cases indicate the FBI may have requested, facilitated, and/or exploited the arrests of U.S. Citizens by foreign governments, often without charges, so they could be held and interrogated, sometimes tortured, and then interviewed by FBI agents. The ACLU represents two proxy detention victims, including Amir Meshal, who was arrested at the Kenya border in 2007 and subjected to more than four months of detention in three different East African countries without charge, access to counsel, or presentment before a judicial officer, at the behest of the U.S. FBI agents interrogated Meshal more than thirty times during his detention. Other Americans traveling abroad discover that their government has barred them from flying; the number of U.S.

Persons on the No Fly List has doubled since 2009. There is no fair procedure for those mistakenly placed on the list to challenge their inclusion. Many of those prevented from flying home have been subjected to FBI interviews after seeking assistance from U.S. The ACLU is suing the government on behalf of 10 American citizens and permanent residents who were prevented from flying to the U.S., arguing that barring them from flying without due process is unconstitutional. These FBI abuses of authority must end. We call on President Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder to tighten FBI authorities to prevent unnecessary invasions of Americans' privacy; prohibit profiling based on race, ethnicity, religion and national origin; and protect First Amendment activities. And we call on Congress to make these changes permanent through statute and improve oversight to prevent future abuse.

The FBI serves a crucial role in protecting Americans, but it must protect our rights as it protects our security. Iii Unleashed and Unaccountable: The FBI's Unchecked Abuse of Authority Introduction On September 4, 2013, James B. Comey was sworn in as the 7th director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Comey is taking the helm of an agency that has transformed during the 12-year term of Director Robert S.

Mueller III into a domestic intelligence and law enforcement agency of unprecedented power and international reach. Today's FBI doesn't just search for evidence to catch criminals, terrorists, and spies. Working with other government agencies and private companies, it helps gather information about millions of law abiding Americans, tracking our communications and associations. It has mapped American communities based on race, ethnicity, religion, and national origin and exploited community outreach programs to monitor the First Amendment activities of religious groups. It has harassed non-violent political activists with surveillance, unwarranted investigations, and even aggressive nationwide raids that resulted in no criminal charges. The FBI retains the information it collects through its investigations and intelligence activities in vast databases containing billions of records that agents can mine for myriad purposes, even without opening an official investigation or otherwise documenting their searches.

The FBI has exploited secret interpretations of the laws governing domestic surveillance to expand its reach and simply ignored other legal restrictions designed to protect our constitutional rights. It has frustrated congressional, judicial, and public oversight through excessive secrecy, official misrepresentations of its activities, and suppression of government whistleblowers and the press. Even more opaque are the FBI's intelligence and law enforcement exploits abroad. American citizens traveling overseas have been detained by foreign governments at the behest of the U.S. Government and interrogated by FBI agents.

Other Americans were blocked from flying home because they were placed on the U.S. Government's No Fly List and then pressured to become FBI informants when they sought redress at U.S. Such abuse is the inevitable product of a deliberate effort by Congress, two presidents, and successive attorneys general to vest the FBI with the powers of a secret domestic intelligence agency. The FBI has an extremely dedicated and proficient workforce that is given the crucial and enormously difficult mission of protecting our nation from a diverse array of domestic and international threats.

When at its best, the FBI uses its law enforcement authorities in a narrowly tailored and focused way to protect American communities from dangerous criminals and defend the national security from foreign spies and terrorists. When it uses its power in a fair and equal manner, the FBI strengthens and reinforces the rule of law by protecting civil rights and holding corrupt government officials and abusive law enforcement officers to account. The tools and authorities the FBI needs to fulfill these critical responsibilities are far too easily abused, however, particularly because they are often exercised under a shroud of secrecy where legal restraints are too easily treated as unnecessary impediments to mission success.

Establishing and 1 maintaining effective checks against error and abuse is necessary for the FBI to remain an effective law enforcement agency and essential to securing liberty and preserving democratic processes. In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, Congress and the attorney general loosened many of the legal and policy restraints on the FBI that had been designed to curb abuses of a previous era.

Ignoring history's lessons, policy makers urged the FBI to take on a greater domestic intelligence role, and it adopted this mission with an overzealous vigor. The FBI's resulting transformation into a secret domestic intelligence agency is dangerous to a free and democratic society, especially because rapidly developing technologies have made it possible for the FBI to gather, catalogue, and analyze massive amounts of information about countless Americans suspected of no wrongdoing at all. There is already substantial evidence that the FBI has gravely misused its new authorities and capabilities, as this report will detail. And there is little evidence to suggest that these new powers have made Americans any safer from crime and terrorism. Members of Congress continue to struggle to obtain reliable information demonstrating the effectiveness of the FBI's overbroad surveillance programs, and several deadly attacks by persons who had previously been investigated by the FBI raise serious questions about whether the influx of data is making it harder to detect threats, rather than easier. Congress and the president should take the opportunity presented by this change of leadership at the FBI to conduct a comprehensive examination of the FBI's policies and practices to identify and curtail any activities that are illegal, unconstitutional, discriminatory, ineffective, or easily misused.

The purpose of this report is to highlight the changes to FBI authorities that have had the most significant impact on the privacy and civil rights and liberties of Americans; to provide examples of error and abuse over the last 12 years that establish evidence of the need for reform; and to offer an agenda to restore the FBI to its proper role in the American criminal justice landscape as the pre-eminent federal law enforcement agency that serves as a model for all others in its effectiveness and in its respect for individual rights and civil liberties. Tension Between Domestic Intelligence Activities and Constitutional Rights Every 90 days for the past seven years the FBI has obtained secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA Court) orders compelling telecommunications companies to provide the government with the toll billing records of every American's telephone calls, domestic and international, on an ongoing daily basis. 1 Other programs have collected similar data about Americans' email and Internet activity and seized the content of their international communications, even though there was no evidence they had done anything wrong. State and local police and the general public are encouraged to report all 'suspicious' people and activity to the FBI. This is what a domestic intelligence enterprise looks like in our modern technological age. 2 Many Americans were shocked to learn that they were the targets of such an outrageously overbroad government surveillance program. Even many members of Congress who passed the statute that enabled this surveillance and were charged with overseeing FBI operations were unaware of the way the government was secretly interpreting the law.

2 But the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) had long warned that turning the FBI into a domestic intelligence agency by providing it with enhanced surveillance and investigative authorities that could be secretly used against Americans posed grave risks to our constitutional rights. Our nation's founders understood the threat unchecked police powers posed to individual liberty, which is why fully half of the constitutional amendments making up the Bill of Rights are designed to regulate the government's police powers. The founders realized that political rights could only be preserved by checking the government's authority to invade personal privacy and by establishing effective due process mechanisms to ensure independent oversight and public accountability.

As the Supreme Court put it, '[t]he Bill of Rights was fashioned against the background of knowledge that unrestricted power of search and seizure could also be an instrument for stifling liberty of expression.' 4 Yet repeatedly since its very beginning over a hundred years ago, the FBI has claimed the authority not just to investigate and prosecute potential violations of law, but to conduct secret domestic intelligence activities that often skirted constitutional protections. Courts traditionally protect Fourth Amendment rights through the 'exclusionary rule,' which prohibits law enforcement officers from using the fruits of illegal searches in criminal prosecutions. 5 But this penalty poses little obstacle for intelligence investigations because the information collected in these programs is rarely intended for, or utilized in, criminal prosecutions. When it is necessary for prosecution, information discovered through secret intelligence programs can easily be replicated using traditional law enforcement tools, shielding the intelligence programs from judicial oversight and public scrutiny. And because these intelligence activities take place in secret, victims rarely know the government has invaded their privacy or violated their rights, so they cannot seek redress. In a previous era, the FBI's unregulated covert domestic intelligence activities went on undiscovered for decades, protected by official secrecy until activists burglarized an FBI office in Media, Pennsylvania, in 1971, and released a thousand domestic intelligence files to reporters.

6 According to the Senate Select Committee established to investigate these illegal intelligence activities, FBI headquarters had opened over 500,000 domestic security files during this time and compiled a list of 26,000 Americans who would be 'rounded up' during a national security emergency. 7 It found that these FBI domestic intelligence operations targeted numerous non-violent protest groups, civil rights organizations, and political dissidents with illegal wiretaps, warrantless physical searches, and an array of harassing 'dirty tricks' designed to infiltrate, obstruct, discredit, and neutralize 'perceived threats to the existing social and political order.' 8 3 The exposure of the FBI's intelligence abuses led to a series of reforms, including the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), a law designed to regulate government surveillance for national security purposes and protect Americans' privacy.

9 An initiative to impose statutory limits on the FBI's authority failed, however. By way of compromise, Attorney General Edward Levi issued written guidelines in 1976 which circumscribed the FBI's authority to conduct domestic security investigations. 10 The Attorney General's Guidelines required the FBI to have a criminal predicate consisting of 'specific and articulable facts giving reason to believe that an individual or group is or may be engaged in activities which involve the use of force or violence,' before opening a full investigations. Upon receipt of information or allegations of criminal activity not meeting this threshold, the guidelines authorized preliminary investigations that allowed FBI agents to develop evidence to justify opening full investigations, but these were strictly limited in both time and scope. Successive attorneys general modified and reinterpreted the Attorney General's Guidelines over the years and developed additional sets of guidelines regulating the FBI's use of informants and undercover operations. The Bush administration alone amended the various FBI guidelines four times after 9/11. But while the Attorney General's Guidelines can be beneficial in establishing objective standards and reasonable limitations on the FBI's power, they are not self-enforcing.

A number of public scandals and investigations by Congress and the Justice Department Inspector General (IG) — both before and after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 — reveal the FBI often violates and/or ignores these internal rules, along with other legal and constitutional limitations. Unleashed: The FBI's Post-9/11 Powers In the aftermath of the September 1 1th attacks the FBI sought to rid itself of these legal restraints and expand its investigative and intelligence collection capabilities. Acting during a period of fear and uncertainty, Congress, the White House, and the attorney general gave the FBI enhanced investigative and surveillance authorities to protect the nation from future terrorists they worried were ready to strike again. Other powers the FBI simply assumed for itself, often secretly, and at times in direct violation of existing laws. Surveillance Powers Given and Taken 1. USA Patriot Act On June 5, 2013, The Guardian published an astonishing Top Secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA Court) order that compelled Verizon Business Network Services to provide the National Security Agency (NSA) with the 'telephony metadata' for all of its customers' domestic and international telecommunications on an 'ongoing daily basis' for the three-month duration of the order. 11 Metadata includes the telephone numbers called and received, calling card numbers, mobile subscriber identity and station information numbers, and time and duration of calls.

This information gives the government a detailed picture of a person's 4 interests, associations, and activities, including personally intimate or potentially embarrassing information, such as whether they've called a virility clinic, Alcoholics Anonymous, or a suicide hotline. The order was issued pursuant to an FBI request for 'business records' under Section 215 of the USA Patriot Act, which authorizes the FISA Court to issue secret demands for 'any tangible things,' based on the FBI's declaration that the information is 'relevant' to a terrorism or espionage investigation. 12 The Washington Post reported that tens of millions of Verizon customers' records have been seized under this program, and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said this order appeared to be 'the exact three-month renewal' of similar orders that began in 2006. 13 With over 200 Section 215 orders issued in 2012, it is very likely that many other telecommunications companies received similar requests for all their customers' metadata as well. 14 And since Section 215 authorizes the government to obtain 'any tangible things,' it is also likely that the FBI uses the provision to do bulk collection of other types of records. The statute specifically states that FBI agents may seek library circulation and book sales records, medical records, tax returns, and firearms sales records using Section 215, with approval of an FBI Executive Assistant Director.

James Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.), the original House of Representatives' sponsor of the Patriot Act, said the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court's order to Verizon reflected an 'overbroad interpretation of the Act' that was 'deeply disturbing.' Sensenbrenner said the language in the statute was not intended to authorize such broad collection and questioned how the phone records of millions of innocent Americans could possibly be deemed 'relevant' to a terrorism or counterintelligence investigation, as Section 215 requires. Indeed, FBI Director Mueller's 201 1 testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee seeking reauthorization of the Patriot Act suggested the FBI interpreted the statute narrowly and used it sparingly: [Section 215] allows us to go to the FISA Court and obtain an order to produce records that may be relevant to, say, a foreign intelligence investigation relating to somebody who's trying to steal our secrets or a terrorist. Upon us showing that the records sought are relevant to this particular investigation — a specific showing it is — the FISA Court would issue an order allowing us to get those records. It's 1 7 been used over 380 times since 2001. What the public didn't know at the time was that the Justice Department and the FISA Court had established a secret interpretation of the law that significantly expanded the scope of what the FBI can collect with Section 215, despite the relatively small number of orders issued each year. At the same 201 1 hearing, Sen.

Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), who has access to this secret interpretation of the law due to his position on the Intelligence Committee but is barred by classification rules from revealing it, challenged Director Mueller: 5 I believe that the American people would be absolutely stunned — I think Members of Congress, many of them, would be stunned if they knew how the PATRIOT Act was being interpreted and applied in practice. Bedienungsanleitung Audi A4 B5 Stance. Wyden and Sen.

Mark Udall (D-Colo.) have repeatedly complained over the last several years that Justice Department officials have made misleading public statements about the scope of this authority, even as they refused their demands to declassify this secret interpretation of law so that Americans could understand how the government is using Section 2 15. 19 It took an unauthorized leak of the FISA Court order to give the public — and many members of Congress — their first glimpse of the government's overbroad use of this Patriot Act authority. Wyden and Sen. Udall have more recently challenged government claims that the bulk collection of telephone metadata under Section 215 has proven effective in preventing terrorist attacks, arguing they've seen no evidence the program 'has provided any otherwise unobtainable intelligence.' 20 The ACLU filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request in 201 1 to force the release of records relating to the government's interpretation or use of Section 215, which is still being litigated.

21 After the leak of the classified FISA Court order, the ACLU (a Verizon customer) filed a lawsuit challenging the government's bulk collection of telephone metadata 22 under the Patriot Act. This is not the first evidence of widespread abuse of this statute, however.

Congress passed the USA Patriot Act just weeks after the 9/11 attacks, greatly expanding the FBI's authority to use surveillance tools originally designed for monitoring hostile foreign agents to secretly obtain personal information about Americans not even suspected of wrongdoing. Congress made several provisions temporary. But when Congress first revisited the expiring provisions in 2005 there was very little public information regarding how the statute had been used.

So in reauthorizing the Act, Congress required the Justice Department Inspector General to audit the FBI's use of two Patriot Act authorities: National Security Letters (NSLs) and Section 215. Not surprisingly, five Inspector General audits conducted over the next several years confirmed widespread FBI abuse and mismanagement of these intelligence collection tools.

A 2007 Inspector General audit revealed that from 2003 through 2005 the FBI issued over 140,000 National Security Letters — secret demands for certain account information from telecommunications companies, financial institutions, and credit agencies that require no judicial approval — almost half of which targeted Americans.