Sep 21, 2016. Solved it this way: Installed the newest JCE-Release and used a media-field instead of a file-field. JCE replaces the media field with its own filepicker, wich is limited to images only. In the form-field xml i've added: filter='. That did the trick, now i am able to select pdf files with a Joomla media field in a.

Revised on 15 November 2016 – This is not a pro-contra review. In this article I try to give you some pointers to make it easy to chose between the two popular content management systems. The basic difference between WordPress and Joomla is that Joomla is a portal- or community type site while WordPress is a blog.

Both overlap each other in several areas and can be extended beyond their original purpose thanks to the use of plugins. You can find those plugins almost everywhere on the internet. Both have a large user base with a lively community where tips and tricks are shared. Both are free to use and many hosting providers have them as an option in their web tools section.

Both have a large community of volunteer developers and commercial add-ons. This topic is somewhat outside the scope of Miracle Tutorials, but the reason I thought it was important to publish is that it relates to the setup of video portals and which CMS to chose, so, here it is: To Joomla or not to Joomla If you want to create a community or a network with a membership area, newsroom, forums, articles, input from external authors etc then Joomla is a good choice because it is made to be that way. Creating a navigation structure is easy, once you understand how it works and it doesn’t require knowledge of html. You can set articles to expire after a time, activate dates, author name, breadcrumbs etc. Thus, Joomla gives you a lot of power in your hands and that is noticeable in the admin section where there are so many options that you get dizzy the first time you go in. You really should get a good book on Joomla if you want to set it up fast. Otherwise you end up fiddling around and getting nowhere for days.

You can find a whole range of books on this subject with. Adapting the look is simple if you are happy with changing some colors and the logo. Beyond that, you will find that Joomla has a complicated structure and even seasoned web developers have to go through a learning curve before they master the layout system, and that approach is different depending on the layout template you chose.

Joomla has multi-lingual capability built-in. This works very well but it is not that simple. You have to follow a certain order over actions to make it work, but it is very powerful. Luckily, there are many video tutorials available on YouTube. Just type “joomla multilingual” in the search box and you will find what you need.

If you do not want to get involved in the gritty work of stylesheets, you can buy professional layout templates for a reasonable price (between $35-$50) from JoomlaShack, for instance. Or you could ask a developer to do it for you, but make sure they have references of Joomla sites or you might end up paying their learning curve and that is what you want to avoid. Disadvantages of Joomla Importing articles from one site to another is not as easy as with WordPress.

There are extensions for it, like J2XMLwhich does a good job, but migrating from one major version to the next can be problematic with respect to third party extensions.(See also below). Joomla brings out new major upgrades on a regular basis. These upgrades break a lot of extensions and migrating from older versions is not an easy task, especially when you have a complex setup with membership system, forum etc This is something the Joomla community really needs to address because moving to the latest version can be time consuming. Joomla promissed that it will make it easier from version 3,4 onwards. Hopefully this is true, because it is the major reason why some people migrate to WordPress. Simple updates between upgrades are easy to do with a click on a button, they seldom break anything.

In short: Joomla’s strenght is in complexity. Deep level navigation, sections in sections, categories etc Unlike, WordPress, it makes no distinction between posts and pages, instead you use articles and modules for your content. Modules are best used for small pieces of content and media. Great for all sorts of sites, with preference for community sites, eCommerce and portfolio/presentation sites. To WordPress or not to WordPress WordPress is basically a very user friendly blog system but it can be used as a regular site which you can update without any knowledge of html (the same goes for Joomla). You can create pages and posts, and with plugins, you can add a lot of functionality included standard in Joomla.

Bitdefender Free Edition Whst. Because WordPress is a blog system, Google seems to love it although recently, Google decides no longer to count links from rss directories, which was the major advantage of WordPress over Joomla. The interface is easy to understand, you won’t need a book for it, although buying a “WordPress for Dummies” – book will save you some time if you have no experience with blog management at all.

Adapting the look requires some knowledge of CSS, the style sheet language. Like with Joomla, if you select a template/theme close to what you want, adapting the colors, logo etc. Is not that complicated but if you do not want to get involved with CSS, and you would like to re-arrange navigation elements as well, you might consider hiring a web developer. Since WordPress has a logical structure, it is easy for a developer to change things around, place ad banners etcAgain, give preference to a specialized developer used to work with WordPress. It is setup very quickly and you can be listed in Google within 2 days. I haven’t seen any other system doing that so far.

For Joomla, it takes about 7 days, although you can push it by using SEO tools. A regular html site can take up to a month to get listed in Google, so this is something to take into account. Anybody can learn enough in 2 hours to create content with WordPress right away, including using categories and sub pages. WordPress has no multi-lingual capability but this can be managed with a plugin like, which is quite easy to use. Major upgrades of WordPress are not as frequent as Joomla and they seldom require extra work. None of my plugins have broken between 3.1 – 4.3, which makes it a very stable platform.

Importing posts and pages from other WP sites is easy. There is built-in importer. Disadvantages of WordPress: For instance, adding or removing post dates, need to be changed in design mode and it requires knowledge of WP scripting.

The navigational structure is determined by the layout template you chose. Changing that structure again requires knowledge of the WP scripting language and CSS. With Joomla, you do not run into this problem because menus are controlled via the control panel and attributes like dates, author name etc, can be turned on and off per article or for the whole site in one go. In that sense, Joomla is much more a content management system. Also, changing the order of categories or pages is rather cumbersome in WordPress.

But you can use a plugin like Post Types Order to change the order op posts. Widgets can help compensate for the lack of a strong menu system like Joomla, but it helps and it is quick to setup with the drag and drop feature. In short: WordPress is simple, you can see it as a blog or as a regular website. It has fixed pages, posts and categories.

Through the use of plugins you can extend its functionality and let it grow as big and complicated as you want. However, not every plugin is easy to understand, so it might be a good idea to have a specialized web developer in case of emergencies. Security measures for both platforms All popular opensource CMS systems are vulnerable for hackers because they know the system.

Joomla and WordPress are both attacked on a regular basis.To minimize the threat, you at least should follow these measures: • Updating the site as soon as there is a security update is therefore important. • You also best install a firewall to block the most common attacks. • For Joomla, you can use, for WordPress. Use the paid versions since the free ones only cover a part of the vulnerabilities. There are many other firewall plugins and some can even be combined to strengthen your security. • If you work with members, force them to use strong, illogical passwords.

What do I need for my video channel? You can add membership functionality in WordPress but Joomla will handle membership much better as it is really made for things like that. So, let’s say, while presuming you do not want to tinker with scripting: • if you want members to access your videos on a subscription basis and have members in various levels of permission (depending on their subscription level), Joomla is your best bet. • If you simply want to show your videos on your site, or you only have 1 type of members and you want things to be simple and clean, WordPress will do nicely.

• If you want to show off different types on videos on your home pages from different sections in your template, more or less like a magazine, again Joomla is better equipped for it. • If you want to create a video journal, WordPress makes life really easy for you. • Both platforms have responsive templates available. If this little list doesn’t do you any good, you can always ask me a question by writing in the comment box below.

I will answer as soon as humanly possible to give you some advice. The great thing is, that if you discover that you selected the wrong system in retrospect, you are not lost because it is always possible to adapt the system. Both systems are open source, which means they are adaptable in every direction. Sometimes those changes will be costly, others peanuts. It depends on what you need to add or adapt. AND, there is a third way: Use them next to each other! Have the best of both worlds if you want to.

Install one of the systems in a sub folder, match the layout more or less and there you have a super site with all the bells and whistles you can imagine. Installation difficult? Given the fact that these are powerful content management systems, installation is a dream, but don’t be fooled by this expression, if you do not know what a database is or what FTP means, you better rent web space with a provider that has the system of your preference in its package.,,,, and others have both WP and Joomla available for you with the press of a button. That said, shared hosting is generally slow. It is fine to start out with, but once you get serious traffic, move to a dedicated server or Virtual Private hosting. You state that Joomla! Is generating tabled output and for that it is not complying with web standards.

This might be true for version 1.0, in version 1.5 we have added a template in the default installation that generates output that is complying to those webstandards. In other words; the designer can choose whatever he wants to output. Also the comment that Joomla!

Will break down with 50.000 unique visitors per day is not a proper statement. We know sites that have around 40 million visitors per week, and Joomla! Is holding perfectlyof course it needs a pretty massive infrastructure, but that is obvious if you have a high traffic website 😉 •. Hi all, First of all, thanks for your comments! It is true that designers can create tableless templates, I use them myself, but if you go look into the source code of the output, you will see that the Joomla 1.5 core elements are still in tables at this time of writing.

As to performance, I have a little explaining to do here: this article is part of a series on building your own video channel and it is meant for non technical website owners who do not really understand how databases on the internet work. I agree that if you tweak the database of a Joomla installation, it is possible to get 50,000 or more visitors a day, but with a standard install and a couple of fancy external plugins, chances that it breaks down is pretty high. Since both Wilco and Randy make a remark about this issue, and I’m sure they are right from their viewpoint, I have rephrased that section. Shani Chalisa In Gujarati Mp3 Download. I thought you might like to know about the responses we are getting to our new networking sites – one social (No Tall Poppies) and one for financial planning(Smart Poppies). They have only been put up in the last week or so and we are adding more content to Smart Poppies every couple of days.

They have both been developed on WordPress (after starting on ireporter as a single site) because WordPress is very friendly with LinkedIn and that means you can maintain a great network on LI and have your blogs and websites connected with no trouble at all. The response is growing every day and this is a sample comment: Hi Lesley, I was setting up my appointment with my financial planner when I remembered you. In the spirit of keeping the connection alive I thought I’d drop a quick line. How’s the sponsorship of the football (?) club going? You were also putting something together for the 35-55 year olds if I remember rightly.

How’s that going? Hope all is well with you. Just a quick touch base.

Regards, Keith Since Keith is in Melbourne, and we are in Perth, it is a great endorsement of the spirit with which the sister sites are being received. The very best financial planners come with a predefined attribute – that makes them stand out from the crowd. Lesley Dewar is one of those financial planners, as she explains in her post “Put-A-Tiger-In-Your-Financial-Plan” Times like this, when the markets are in turmoil and customers are seeking reassurance, that you profit the most by being highly visible and having a sound web presence. Having access to something as simply as WordPress means that it is very easy for a small business to develop a net presence – that is Google friendly too – if you add some content. We are not putting up videos (yet) and have been able to link a slide show to Smart Poppies as well, using powerpoint – that was easy too.

Overall, WordPress – so far – has done everything we need, when we work it in conjunction with LinkedIn; that may not suit everyone. I think you are confusing a template written in tables with “core output.” If you select a template written in table-less CSS – then your output will be completely table-less. I wrote the template myself – it’s completely table-less – meaning – the code outputted to the browser (core?) is all without tables. If the entire website that is visible to a user, including spiders like Google is tableless-div -then what is the issue here? Also, it’s well known you can get millions of visitors on a joomla site without crashes.

That is just flat out incorrect. I ask that you please update your article to reflect factual information. Hi Ryan, Thanks for your comment. But you have to realize that I’m discussing out-of-the-box solutions for non technical people, while you see this from your viewpoint as a web developer.

I’m sure you agree there is a distinction. I agree your template is completely table-less and it is the first I encounter, actually. So, you have my compliments and if you develop commercial templates for sale, I’m more then happy to add your url to the, in which I show Joomla and WordPress installation options. And if you know about other commercial templates that are really table-less such as yours, I’d love to hear it. I therefore have adapted that part, thanks for putting that right.

Regarding traffic: I repeat that there is no way that an out-of-the-box installation of Joomla can handle millions of visitors. Most developers tweak their databases for better performance. A non technical person cannot do that without help. I wish you were right, Phantom, but a look at the source code of my test site with the JA_purity template: It will reveal that there are still tables in the code, notwithstanding the fact the template itself does not contain tables.

Ryan wrote to me that his table-less template is custom made, which is of course possible if you are a web developer, no doubt about that. As it happens, web developers are not the audience of this site, therefore this information will only confirm that you need to have web developer skills to setup Joomla without tables. Hi Jeff, I do not know Wishlist Member, although I tested several membership plugins. All of them have some quirks, alas. I’m currently working on a full membership site, (the one that I have now is a primitive password protected page).

I’m using “Members Only”, which protects every page, even if you don’t want to. Therefore, I use a work around: I simply have set up a second WordPress site in a subfolder and in this way you have a totally independent section in your site with its own database and templates. I hope to have it finished next week, but it is rather busy right now, so I can ‘t work on it one go. In any case, as far as tests go, this works for me. Hope this helps? What I mean is that you can have Joomla as your main site and for instance WordPress in a sub folder. If you make sure the layout looks more or less the same, nobody will even notice they entered into another CMS.

That way, you can have the advantages of both systems and your options to expand the site are limitless because if a forum doesn’t work properly on WordPress, no problem, you use one for Joomla and the other way around. As with all systems, they have their limitations and by using both, you are not limited in one direction. Especially in your case, where you want to have a full fledged community site, this is definitely a good idea.

Hi Ali, Interesting question! If you are positive that you are going to attract that kind of traffic and you are planning such a large database, the cms doesn’t really matter anymore because you will need a seasoned web developer to tweak the database in any case. Most databases are fine with 4,000-10,000 records or so.

Beyond that, things get a bit hairy with the standard settings. So, what I would do in your case is to talk with a web company or a developer used to maintain big community sites and ask for good references before you decide to work with them. You may also want to consider a dedicated server, because with shared hosting, your site will get sluggish. To clarify: shared hosting means that you are with thousands of other sites on the same server, while if you have a dedicated server, you actually have a server for yourself, which only contains the sites you own. The result is that performance is much better and you have total control over the software on that server. The downside is that you need somebody who knows how to run a server.

However, if you are on a tight budget, getting there will take time. And if you have to start out on your own without assistance, you might want to begin with WordPress, because it gets you quickly into Google and as long as you stay below 10,000 posts, nothing dramatic is going to happen.

Still, it depends what your requirements are, other then a large database, before you truly can decide whether is will be joomla or WP. If you want a community site, you might want to work with Joomla instead. I hope this is useful? I’m interested in creating an activity site. In other words there would be an average of about 30 activity pages as well as location pages and regional pages.

On each activity page there will be a “book bow” button which actually sends the user to a booking engine outside of whatever CMS system is used. Do you think WordPress could handle this?

I have tinkered with Joomla for a couple years but like the usability level of WP better. What do you think is this possible? Thanks in advance for any feedback! The simplest solution in your situation is probably WordPress, nothwithstanding you are not interesting in blogging.

You can create fixed pages very easily and the posts could be used for news. Although many developers use Joomla for small sites as well, and there is nothing against it, my personal idea is that it is overkill in terms of management and adapting the often complicated templates (colors, images) is not easy if you are new in web development. With WP, you generally only have to deal with one stylesheet. Excellent article, however personally i don’t think its fair to compare between the 2 CMS’s as Joomla has unlimited advanced features that currently WP doesn’t cover, it will be suitable to compare between them If WP grow up to compete on the same level of Joomla or to compare them only for blogging, which also i don’t think its fair because you will be taking maybe 2% of Joomla advantages and throw the rest. Having said that there are so many tangible and intangible criteria’s in comparing between applications each with its cons and pros thus what makes the real difference in my opinion is knowing your exact requirements, and if the CMS can meet these needs with minimum time and programing skills or not. I will vote for Joomla as it answers all my clients growing demands, however with comments on the support as its not yet taken as serious as it should. Also till date i don’t see serious companies adapting this CMS and building commercial solutions with it, which still limit Joomla from spreading its wings over the CMS world.